Evangelism Part III: Hurling Stumbling Blocks.
“Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."
Stumbling: To miss one's step in walking or running; trip and almost fall.
Block: Interruption, especially obstruction.
A stumbling block is an obstruction in the path toward God’s purpose that can cause one to trip and fall. Peter in his love, zeal and fear to protect his friend and teacher became a potential obstruction to what God was attempting to accomplish in the life of Jesus.
Peter’s perceived need to defend Jesus had nothing to do with Jesus; rather it was all about Peter.
Peter himself was the stumbling block.
I suspect that is true today. I wonder when and where I have hurled a block in someone’s path. There's a good chance that when I feel the need to defend Jesus that it is more about me than it is Jesus.
This term is used throughout scripture. Paul used it in the context of food laws when the early church often argued and debated over very important matters. In his letter to the Corinthians he tied it into arrogance and knowledge. In his letter to the Romans Paul encouraged folks to stop passing judgment on one another and instead, make up their minds not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in another’s way.
While working as a Chaplain I routinely encountered people who in their journey have been tripped up by those who thought they possessed the perfect knowledge of God and felt an intense need to defend Jesus. I have found this to be equally true in the church. It seems that often in one’s effort to save and protect Jesus and the need to be right or win a religious argument he/she can often become a stumbling block to the work of God.
The same thing happened when Jesus met up with religious authorities who opposed his radical way. Jesus spent a great deal of his ministry overcoming the obstacles in people’s lives that had been put there by religious authorities. There was always someone quoting the law to him and questioning his relationships and methods. He had to seek and save those who had been lost behind a pile of legal religious rubble.
Some folks I’ve ministered to had so many blocks tossed in their path by religious zealots who thought they possessed the “right” doctrine and were out to defend Jesus that a wall had been constructed in their path to God. Often times I have found myself deconstructing the walls built by the blocks that have been hurled into another’s path. Many that I have met have actually been hit and severely wounded by the blocks hurled in their direction.
Based on Matthew’s account of Jesus and Peter, it seems that an effort to defend Jesus can really more about one’s ego about one’s belief--or human things. It often seems to be about control and needing to be right rather than love. The same can be said for Paul’s instruction to the church in Rome and Corinth.
I wonder if too often what is considered evangelism is more like hurling blocks into the path of those on their way to God. Like Peter, I suspect anytime I am on a mission to save Jesus or win a religious argument there’s a good chance that I am a stumbling block to what God may be doing in another’s life.
I wonder how many have made their way to the Church doors only to get there and discover one huge wall of stumbling blocks left by Christians that prevent people from discovering God?
17 Comments:
While working as a Chaplain I routinely encountered people who in their journey have been tripped up by those who thought they possessed the perfect knowledge of God and felt an intense need to defend Jesus. I have found this to be equally true in the church. It seems that often in one’s effort to save and protect Jesus and the need to be right or win a religious argument he/she can often become a stumbling block to the work of God.
I can't tell you how many times I've seen this phenomenon. It's pride, of course, and it's the trap that snared Lucifer.
It's also why I shy away from all things overtly relgious these days. Religiosity makes me want to start looking for the snares and the tripwires and the nooses and leading strings.
Jesus was all about encounter. About meeting people where they were and leaving them with a new perspective. He wasn't about tripping them up or shutting them out or ensnaring them or dragging them kicking and screaming.
That's where you see the true face of Christ - in every day encounter. Not in religion-mongers. Not in the great Jesus-snake-oil salesmen. Not in the threatening, doom-and-gloom-predicting churches. You meet Christ every day in the person who waves you in ahead of him during the rush hour commute, or in the saleswoman who takes ten extra seconds out of her day to make a kind, cheerful comment to an otherwise harried and exhausted customer.
Christ is always in the little stuff, the moments, the details. He's everywhere, but you have to make sure the candles and the holy water and the gaudy vestments and the incense don't distract you. He's there if you pay attention to the small stuff.
Thanks anonymous. I appreciate your taking the time to write. You deepened my post by your comments. Thanks you.
There's a good chance that when I feel the need to defend Jesus that it is more about me than it is Jesus.
This really broke my heart, the truth of it really...and yet the process, the transforming..perhaps that's a part of the process....and seeing it, in the heartbreak of seeing it I can remember??? I really hope so....Romans 4: 18 Against all hope, Abraham in hope believed ...in hope believed....my only HOPE is Christ.....thanks Rick and Anonymous for a really good jolt in my thinking this morning....
Rick, this is a brilliant, sobering and humbling post. I am awed and grateful that you are YOU and you are here! (Don't worry, this is a reasonably idolatry-free zone).
But on the flip side Rick, wasn't Jesus the biggest stumbling block of all times, too?
For in Scripture it says:
'See, I lay a stone in Zion,
a chosen and precious cornerstone,
and the one who trusts in him
will never be put to shame.'
Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe,
'The stone the builders rejected
has become the capstone,'
and,
'A stone that causes men to stumble
and a rock that makes them fall.'
They stumble because they disobey the message—which is also what they were destined for. - IPe.2:6-8
And so, if Jesus Himself could be the biggest stumbling block to his people, and if any of our actions could be perceived as stumbling block to some, then it's not that big of a deal, right? Besides, couldn't God use all of our misguided attempts, even in the high-steeple church, for something good for His cause?
Bumble, That was good. I liked that! Thanks.
We are called to be "living stones" not stumbling blocks.
As you know the writer of Peter was quoting the prophet Isaiah and this wasn't about being a "stumbling block" to encountering God or accomplishing God's purpose.
Jesus wasn't a stumbling block to God's purpose. He was a stumbling block to those who opposed him.
While I love your comments and like how you tied it in, it is slightly different in context.
Good stuff, bro! Thanks.
"I wonder how many have made their way to the Church doors only to get there and discover one huge wall of stumbling blocks left by Christians that prevent people from discovering God?"
I don't know. Maybe all of them. I think it was Philip Yancey that said, "People don't do to church because they've already been."
To me the biggest stumbling block is the evangelical insistence on giving greatest weight to the least inspired aspects of the New Testament and Bible.
For example, the gospels do present Jesus as regularly telling people who don't accept him that they're going to hell. But of course the gospels also have plenty of much better material!
Oooh, I like what Darius said.
So, there is a posibility of dependence on perspectives. If I like what you said, then it's "living stone"; if not, then it's "stumbling block".
Could anything be more postmodern than that?
Rick, may be you could post your thoughts as a next entry?
Rick,
I just read your last two posts. I preach at a small chapel in Indiana and I hope you don't mind me using your posts because I like quoting wise men. Good Stuff!!!!
Peace,
Cliff
Dera Cliff, welcome. Yes, please feel free to borrow from what I wrote. I am honored that you'd want to use it.
Bumble,
hey brother. Thanks for your comments. I am not sure what you mean by postmodern???
I was only quoting scripture and the verse you used, The writer of Peter said we are to be "living stones".
Jesus was a "stumbing block" to the powers and rulers in Israel.
My post had nothing to do with either.
It is how we become stumbling blocks to God's purpose when in our love, fear, or zeal we attempt to protect Jesus and what we think about Jesus, just like Peter did.
I think some of the ways this happens is when folks get in pissing contests about scripture, trying to be right, beliefs etc.
Most of these arguments have nothing to do about God or Jesus, but our ego's need to be right and superior. When it becomes about us and not God, there's a good chance we are causing another to stumble.
Hope that helps.
Blessings
there's a beauty and a boldness in what you've been writing lately;
and another element i've been lovin' is the continuation of your posts, and as you said, the "deepening" from commenters and your various responses.
keep on keepin' on, my friend. you're on a roll.
Thanks again, Jeff.
So Darius and Bumble,
So you are telling me you believe that Jesus loves us bunches and bunches but if we don't "accept" him then we are going to burn in hell?
Jesus sounds more like Tony Soprano. "Look, I like you. I'll even go as far as sayin' that I love you. So here's the deal, i took the hit for you and if you don't bow down and worship me, i'm going to have Pauley take you out back and torch you with a flame-thrower. it's your choice and don't blame me for your bad choices."
Hi Rick,
Sorry for using the term postmodern without explaining. Basically the social science pundits in seminary starts seeing the emerging culture. May be I should borrow this definition "The term postmodernism can be used in a broad cultural sense, or more specifically for theories perceived as relativist, nihilist, counter-Enlightenment or antimodern; particularly while in opposition to rationalism, universalism, foundationalism or science. It is also sometimes used to describe social changes which are held to be antithetical to traditional systems of philosophy, religion, and morality." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism)
So basically, a pomo guy might see opposite (and sometimes conflicting) angles of the same issue - basically and fancy word for what I am: a wimp {grin}
And my answer to your question on burning in hell is this: I don't really know (Origen once proposed that hell will be emptied, but some other dude argued against it).
All I know is that Jesus said that if we believe in Him, we will have life - now and forever. (And of course, I don't buy the notion of "believe" as mere intelectual cognition but something beyond it - an "experience" in your term).
Hope that clears up some miscommunication on my part.
Your stuff is always interesting to read...
Hi Rick,
Sorry for using the term postmodern without explaining. Basically the social science pundits in seminary starts seeing the emerging culture. May be I should borrow this definition "The term postmodernism can be used in a broad cultural sense, or more specifically for theories perceived as relativist, nihilist, counter-Enlightenment or antimodern; particularly while in opposition to rationalism, universalism, foundationalism or science. It is also sometimes used to describe social changes which are held to be antithetical to traditional systems of philosophy, religion, and morality." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism)
So basically, a pomo guy might see opposite (and sometimes conflicting) angles of the same issue - basically and fancy word for what I am: a wimp {grin}
And my answer to your question on burning in hell is this: I don't really know (Origen once proposed that hell will be emptied, but some other dude argued against it).
All I know is that Jesus said that if we believe in Him, we will have life - now and forever. (And of course, I don't buy the notion of "believe" as mere intelectual cognition but something beyond it - an "experience" in your term).
Hope that clears up some miscommunication on my part.
Your stuff is always interesting to read...
Thanks Bumble,
Actually, I know what postmodern means, I just didn't know what you meant when you used it here. Sorry to put you through that drill.
Yes, I would agree that "believe" is much broader than an intellectual exercise.
Thanks again for your comments. I've enoyed your visits.
Blessings,
Rick
Rick, you've done a beautiful job of enlarging on what Tex Sample told me in my first "Intro to Ministry" class, 9 long years ago:
If there is one thing I hope you hear during this whole class, it's this: Stop trying to "save" God from un-Godly people! He just don't need it!
So many of the stumbling-blocks that I see thrown are from folks (even well-meaning ones) who feel that any affront against God's sovreignty or majesty must be met with some kind devastating retaliatory "shock and awe" reaction.
Do they really believe that they somehow need to protect the one who set the pillar-of-fire in the night sky? Does the Holy Spirit really need me to get indignant and combative on Her behalf?
I think not.
In the rooms of recovery, the single most frequently-recurring theme I hear is how the primary barrier to belief in God is based on what some pastor or supposedly-righteous group of folks said or did in God's name.
And when I'm just about to give up on the church as a human institution, I come over here, Rick, and I hear you, and I say to myself, "Self, wouldn't this be a wonderful world if there were just one church with one pastor like Rick in every city?..."
Not to pump you up or anything...but the world needs to hear what you have to say, brother. So preach on...
Post a Comment
<< Home